Re: Rolling Stone is a *wanker* of a magazine

nian fiedler ([email protected])
Thu, 12 Nov 1998 08:11:59 -0800 (PST)

You are correct - there is no U2 information in the latest Rolling
Stone. Alanis is on the cover and I had to tear that off before I
could even have it sitting around my house!

Of course it's filled with her moronic babbling which she finds so
profound (ie. "Being famous is like not being famous at all - only
more so") What the fuck is that?!?!

I totally disagree that it is her time to shine. She got waaaay too
much attention last time around!

I say we have a letter writing campaign!! I have already sent two
letters in (one from me and one from my wife) expressing my disgust.

It doesn't even have to be about lack of U2 content, although that
would be a nice extra. Let Rolling Stone hear the VOICE OF WIRE!!

ps. I don't think there was a review of the GH album because it was
too early. If you notice, Alanis, Rolling Stones, Oasis, and Hanson
did not get there albums reviewed either.

nian

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Thu Nov 12 1998 - 08:15:10 PST