Tim Tschirner ([email protected])
Tue, 15 Sep 1998 09:33:59 +0200
>Is anybody else getting annoyed at how people keep mistakenly referring to
>the album as Greatest Hits? It's a BEST OF. . .and there's a difference
>between the two. A GH collection implies that the tracks were selected not
>by individual merit, but by single sales and radio play. Now THAT's
blatant
>commercialism. U2 decided that these tracks represent their best output in
>the last decade.
aww c'mon, look at the track listing once again. It's all their singles
(starting with War, ending with R&H) plus Sunday Bloody Sunday
and Bad because that's the two songs a lot of people know as well
(remember Live Aid?), so I don't see much of a difference to a
"Greatest Hits" or "The Singles Part I". The final prove is for sure the
inclusion of When Love Comes To Town of which I won't believe that
U2 think this represents one of their best output.
Tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.0b2 on Tue Sep 15 1998 - 01:03:31 PDT